Justice Denied sPain
Justice Denied: How Bar Associations in Spain Protect Lawyers Instead of the Public
Over the past five years, I have witnessed first-hand how some lawyers in Spain and Portugal have acted not as defenders of justice, but as architects of abuse. I have been the victim of calculated fraud, coercion, and legal manipulation by lawyers whose professional role should be to uphold the law and protect the vulnerable. Instead, they exploited it—and me.
This post is not simply a personal account. It is a critique of how professional regulation in Spain, particularly in Andalusia, is structurally incapable of holding lawyers accountable. It is a warning to anyone who believes that bar associations ("illustrious colegios de abogados") are truly designed to protect the public. And it is a call to reform a system that enables impunity under the guise of professional self-governance.
Estepona: Legal Abuse as Business Model
In Estepona, I uncovered serious financial irregularities in the administration of a residential community of homeowners. My attempts to expose this triggered an orchestrated retaliation by lawyers connected to the community's power structure. They initiated SLAPP-style litigation and fabricated debts to silence my inquiries. What followed was a campaign of pressure, disinformation and strategic legal delay.
These lawyers and their collaborators targeted me in part because I am a scots-speaking foreigner with health difficulties—an easy mark for a system that favours insiders and punishes dissenters. Their actions were not mere incompetence or negligence. They acted with intent, coordination and an alarming sense of impunity.
Institutional Silence: Closed Circle of Protection
I filed detailed complaints with Illustrious Bar Association of Málaga (ICAMálaga), supported by documentation. The response? Silence. Not once did ICAMálaga initiate an independent investigation or acknowledge the serious ethical breaches involved. Internal communications obtained later revealed bias: the lawyers I complained about were personally known to members of the reviewing committee.
My appeals to Consejo Andaluz de Colegios de Abogados (Andalusian regional council) were similarly fruitless. Despite being positioned as a coordinating body, it refused to recognise even the possibility of regulatory failure at local level. Consejo General de la Abogacía Española, Spain's national legal council, continues to claim incompetence to intervene.
Thus, the structure is clear: Local bar associations have full disciplinary control, but no external body has authority to review their failures. In effect, lawyers police themselves.
European Outlier
Compare this to other EU countries. France, Italy and Netherlands all have national disciplinary bodies or transparent appeals mechanisms. Germany allows complaints to escalate beyond regional bar chambers. Even within Spain, lawyers may practice nationally, but complaints are confined to their home colegios. There is no functional oversight above the local level.
This is not just a legal design flaw—it is a human rights risk.
System Builds to Serve Itself
Many witnessed abuses stem from deeper confusion between residential and commercial interests. In Estepona, what was legally defined as a residential community was, in reality, run like a commercial resort. Homeowners—especially non-resident ones—were treated as revenue sources, not stakeholders.
A simple principle could clarify this: If a property is not used as a permanent residence, it should be considered commercial. Legal protections for homes should not be exploited by those who use housing for vanity, speculation or passive undeclared income. Legal profession should be at the forefront of defending that distinction. Instead, in my case, lawyers worked to obscure it.
Accountability: A Global Perspective
It is not enough to call merely on Spain to reform. European Union should establish baseline standards for legal professional discipline, including a right to independent review and transparent complaint procedures. But the issue is global. United Nations, too, must recognise the vulnerability of individuals facing legal abuse by professionals shielded by weak regulation.
Universal minimum standards are required for regulation of legal professionals, e.g:
Independent national disciplinary bodies
Publicly accessible complaint records
Protection for complainers (including foreigners, linguistic minorities and disabled individuals)
Explicit condemnation and regulation of SLAPP tactics
Conclusion
Without independent, transparent and enforceable national systems of professional accountability, lawyers are not guardians of justice—they become instruments of injustice.
Bar associations in Andalusia failed in their duty to protect the public. When lawyers act with impunity, democracy suffers. When those entrusted to uphold law exploit it for personal gain, trust erodes. Reform is overdue.
Welcome to FrAvarice: Where Public Land Becomes Private Loot
An exposé from the windswept dunes of Montalivet to the gilded boardrooms of global finance.
In the sun-bleached pine forests of southwest France, nestled beside the Atlantic’s salty breath, lies a supposed utopia of naturist living: CHM Montalivet. Touted as a bastion of liberté, simplicité, and communion with nature, CHM sells an image of carefree vacationing and communal living. But peel back the layer of sunscreen, and a different picture emerges — one that has more to do with rent-seeking, privatization, and opaque financial flows than it does with sandcastles and sunbathing.
🏕️ A Model of Communal Living… or Extractive Leasing?
CHM Montalivet sits on land owned by the municipality of Vendays-Montalivet — technically public land. In theory, this should mean oversight, accountability, and benefit to the public. In practice? That land is leased to a private company — most recently European Camping Group (ECG) (via various subsidiaries) — which in turn subleases it to over a thousand mobile home owners, vacationers, and around 300 permanent residents.
These residents don’t own the land their homes sit on — they lease it. And every year, the cost of that lease creeps ever upward. Residents are faced with substantial, opaque fees for things like “management services,” “infrastructure contributions,” “waste collection,” or whatever creative label the accountants prefer this year.
And where does the real value go? Not back to the town. Not into the site. But up the financial food chain — to private equity firms who treat CHM not as a community, but as a yield-generating asset.
💰 Follow the Money: Carlyle, OTPP, and PAI Partners
SOCNAT’s parent company, European Camping Group, has passed through the hands of some of the world’s most powerful private equity players:
Carlyle Group (USA): A titan of global finance with deep ties to government and defense contracting.
Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (Canada): Because what better way to fund retirement than to wring euros from a naturist campsite?
PAI Partners (France): The current controlling shareholder, headquartered in Paris, recently sold a stake to Abu Dhabi Investment Authority.
These firms don’t invest for love of camping. They invest for IRR — internal rate of return. Every fee, every rent hike, every cutback in services is a pixel in a larger spreadsheet — one aimed at maximizing extraction from residents who often have no meaningful alternative.
📧 Silencing Dissent, One Reservation at a Time
What happens when someone questions this setup?
… lack of transparency: undisclosed lease terms between the town and ECG, exorbitant sublease fees, and the slow economic erosion of resident property value in favour of shareholder gain …
The response?
Reservation denied.
Subject Access Request (under GDPR)? Refused.
Reason given? Not law — just satire. Yes, the whistleblower’s use of mild irony in their correspondence was offered as a pretext for the withdrawal of service.
In other words, SOCNAT, operating a business on publicly owned land, using the name of CHM — is now engaging in retaliatory exclusion, punishing those who ask too many questions with commercial exile.
🧯 FrAvarice in Action
Welcome to FrAvarice, where:
Public land is quietly monetised for private gain;
Residents pay top euro to lease the land their homes stand on;
Transparency is treated like a nuisance, not a civic duty;
And whistleblowers are punished with silence, instead of answered with facts.
This isn’t just bad governance — it’s a case study in how privatised control over public assets enables soft censorship and economic displacement.
⚖️ What’s Next?
There are still questions to be answered:
What is the actual rent paid by ECG to the town for use of this land?
Why are hundreds of permanent residents treated like transient cash flows?
Can a private company operating on public land refuse service based on a customer’s protected whistleblower status?
Will French courts, data protection authorities, or anti-discrimination bodies respond?
For now, the answer seems to be: you can come to CHM, but only if you keep your mouth shut.
FrAvarice is not just a joke. It’s a mirror — held up to the face of modern governance, where the illusion of community masks the reality of capital extraction. Whether you’re in a tent, a mobile home, or a beachfront chalet, one thing’s clear:
In this game of public land and private loot, transparency is the one thing nobody’s renting.
Language & Integrity
🌍 Rethinking “Federation” in Naturism
Naming is never neutral. Words carry weight—especially in global movements shaped by history, identity, and governance. As naturism continues to evolve, a simple but urgent question arises: what do we mean when we say “federation”?
Currently, the term federation is used in two different—and conflicting—ways within international naturist circles. On one hand, it's applied to a global umbrella organization INF-FNI, which claims to represent naturism on a worldwide scale. On the other, it is also commonly used by many of INF-FNI’s own member organizations—often aligned with nation-states—to describe themselves as federations too.
This dual use isn’t just confusing. It represents a structural contradiction. And it weakens political clarity and philosophical coherence of the movement.
Conflict of Interest: Who Speaks for Whom?
The problem is simple: an international umbrella organization that describes itself as a federation cannot, in good faith, consist primarily of other organizations also calling themselves federations. This nested use of the same title implies an overlapping structure, blurring lines of representation.
More seriously, it introduces an inherent conflict of interest. Any global federation that is primarily constituted of national federations risks privileging national representation over naturist philosophy itself—which, by its very nature, transcends national boundaries.
Naturism is not a national identity. It is a lived practice of freedom, integrity, ecological awareness and non-sexual social nudity. It should not be constrained by political borders. Yet when membership and representation are framed along those same borders, the movement reinforces what it seeks to question.
Proposal for Clarity: One Federation, One Title
The proposed new INGO, tentatively titled Naturist Federation, aims to correct this confusion. But doing so requires a clear and principled naming policy:
Naturist Federation will not admit any organization whose name includes the phrase “Naturist Federation.”
This is not a symbolic gesture. It is a practical necessity. No member of a body called Naturist Federation should also claim that title independently—just as no country can call itself United Nations France or World Health Germany.Naturist Federation will not admit natural persons as members.
This follows the model used by organizations like International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), where individual participation happens through affiliation with member bodies—not direct membership. It preserves the integrity of the INGO as a coordinating structure and avoids personal political conflicts.Any existing organization that currently identifies itself as a “naturist federation” must choose a new name if it wishes to join.
This request is not made lightly. Clarity of structure requires clarity of identity. Encouraging name changes is a way to invite transformation, not erase history.
A Shift Already Underway
It’s worth noting that some organizations have already made this shift:
British Naturism
American Association for Nude Recreation
Open & Bloot
These names reflect national presence without claiming the title of federation, which opens the door to participation in a truly international federation built on equality, not hierarchy. Unfortunately, INF-FNI still supports an incoherent naming model—permitting a “federation of federations,” which neither strengthens naturism politically nor reflects the movement’s non-nationalist foundations.
Toward a New Structure
This is not about rejecting past efforts. It is about naming contradictions clearly, so they can be healed. Creating a coherent, inclusive, and principled Naturist Federation means starting with language—and building from there. What comes next depends on reflection, dialogue and shared values. But clarity begins with names.
This post was written by a human being, with research and drafting assistance from AI.
Naturism for a New Century
Possible New Homes for 3 Global INGOs
Naturism continues to grow—culturally, politically, and philosophically. This growth calls for new forms of international organization that reflect current priorities: body freedom, collaborative governance, and deep ecological stewardship. INF-FNI has shaped much of modern naturist history, but at more than 70 years old it could imagine a graceful conclusion: Not as failure, but as fulfilment—a life well lived. From its legacy, three new INGOs could emerge, each carrying forward distinct values:
🌿 Body Freedom – centered on bodily autonomy and creative expression
🌍 Naturist Federation – coordinating communities, dialogue, and mutual recognition
🌱 Naturist Spaces – acquiring and stewarding land for conservation and naturist living
Jurisdiction Isn’t Just Bureaucracy
Choice of headquarters is more than legal paperwork. It shapes what kind of work an organization can do, what kind of donations it can accept, how it treats employees, and how well it aligns with its mission. With a little help from AI, I’ve identified three possible jurisdictions for each of proposed INGO:
🌿 Body Freedom – Global Advocacy, Local Belonging
Proposed HQ: New Zealand, Canada or Australia
This initiative envisions a global human rights movement with local roots—focused on community-building, artistic practice, and advocacy for bodily autonomy. No need for grand conferences or centralization. These countries offer strong civil rights protections, good legal structures for non-profits, and inclusive cultures that value self-expression. Geographical distance becomes a strength, not a weakness.
🌍 Naturist Federation – A European Hub for Cooperation
Proposed HQ: Belgium, Netherlands, Denmark
This proposed new international organization (see next blog post) would support international collaboration between naturist communities—requiring travel, governance, and sustained dialogue. Proximity to EU institutions makes a real difference. These countries are transparent, well-governed, and already home to many international NGOs. They also reflect naturist values: openness, equality, shared space.
🌱 Naturist Spaces – Land, Legacy, and Stewardship
Proposed HQ: France, Finland, Norway
This INGO would need to manage serious resources—land, capital, legal obligations. It must also hold deep ecological integrity. France offers naturist history and tax frameworks for public-benefit foundations. Finland and Norway bring environmental leadership and legal respect for nature’s autonomy. All three allow for the kind of long-term land stewardship naturist spaces demand.
This post is just a sketch—a first public draft of a larger idea. Future posts may explore legal forms, timelines, or founding charters. For now, it feels important to begin with clarity, curiosity, and a sense of care for what comes next.
This reflection was written by a human being, with research and drafting assistance from AI.
Possible Jurisdictions for 3 INGOs
1. Body Freedom
Mission: A globally dispersed human rights advocacy movement focusing on bodily autonomy and self-expression, encouraging local in-person gatherings for community-building, artistic, and sporting activities without necessitating large international conferences.
Proposed Jurisdictions:
New Zealand
Rationale: New Zealand's progressive stance on human rights and personal freedoms complements the organization's mission. Its geographic location in the Asia-Pacific region facilitates outreach in underrepresented areas.
Legal Form: Incorporated Society or Charitable Trust, both offering limited liability and suitable for non-profit activities.
Workers' Rights: New Zealand enforces strong labor laws, including protections for lone workers and mandates for regular contact and emergency protocols.
Canada
Rationale: Canada's multicultural society and legal protections for individual rights provide a supportive environment. Its bilingual nature (English and French) aids in broader communication.
Legal Form: Non-Profit Corporation or Registered Charity, offering limited liability and eligibility for tax-exempt status.
Workers' Rights: Canadian labor laws vary by province but generally include strong protections, with specific regulations for lone workers in provinces like Alberta and British Columbia.
Australia
Rationale: Australia's commitment to civil liberties and its strategic location in the Southern Hemisphere support global outreach efforts.
Legal Form: Incorporated Association (state-level) or Company Limited by Guarantee (federal), both suitable for non-profit organizations.
Workers' Rights: Australia has comprehensive labor laws, including specific provisions for lone workers, ensuring their health and safety.
2. Naturist Federation
Mission: To unite naturist communities worldwide under a democratic, inclusive framework that advocates for naturist rights and standards, necessitating in-person meetings and conferences with a focus on reducing carbon footprints.
Proposed Jurisdictions:
Belgium
Rationale: As the de facto capital of the EU, Belgium offers proximity to European institutions, facilitating advocacy and collaboration.
Legal Form: Association Internationale Sans But Lucratif (AISBL), designed for international non-profit associations.
Workers' Rights: Belgium has robust labor laws, including recent legislation granting comprehensive rights to workers in various sectors.
Netherlands
Rationale: The Netherlands' central location in Europe and progressive legal environment make it suitable for international federations.
Legal Form: Stichting (Foundation) or Vereniging (Association), both offering limited liability and flexibility.
Workers' Rights: Dutch labor laws provide strong protections, and the country is known for its favorable work-life balance.
Denmark
Rationale: Denmark's high levels of transparency and support for civil society initiatives align with the federation's goals.
Legal Form: Forening (Association), characterized by its democratic structure.
Workers' Rights: Denmark is recognized for its strong labor protections and flexible working conditions.
3. Naturist Spaces
Mission: To function as a financial powerhouse for environmental conservation, acquiring and stewarding land globally for re-wilding and naturist activities, requiring favorable tax exemptions for donations and bequests.
Proposed Jurisdictions:
France
Rationale: France's rich history of naturism and vast rural areas make it ideal for land conservation initiatives.
Legal Form: Fondation Reconnue d'Utilité Publique (Public Utility Foundation), eligible for tax-exempt status.
Tax Considerations: Donations to public utility organizations are tax-exempt, and donors may receive tax credits, enhancing fundraising capabilities.
Workers' Rights: France has comprehensive labor laws, including provisions for annual leave and worker protections.
Finland
Rationale: Finland's strong environmental policies and cultural respect for nature support the organization's mission.
Legal Form: Rekisteröity yhdistys (Registered Association) or Säätiö (Foundation), both suitable for non-profit activities.
Tax Considerations: Finland offers tax incentives for environmental initiatives, and donations to registered associations may be tax-deductible.
Workers' Rights: Finland ranks highly in labor rights indices, reflecting strong protections for workers.
Norway
Rationale: Norway's emphasis on environmental conservation and open access to land aligns with the organization's goals.
Legal Form: Forening (Association) or Stiftelse (Foundation), both offering limited liability and suitable for managing land assets.
Tax Considerations: Norway provides tax incentives for environmental conservation efforts, and donations to qualifying organizations can be tax-exempt.
Workers' Rights: Norwegian labor law emphasizes fair wages, strong unions, collective bargaining, and work-life balance.
Lace, Leverage & Liquidation
Love Letter to Victoria’s Secret:
Naturally and artificially intelligent humans track stock indices, fashion faux pas and long shadow of pink-lit mall retail. As a non-binary entity who’s never bought so much as a thong from Victoria’s Secret (or wanted to), I’ve nonetheless watched with amusement as this frilly little empire of underwire and aspiration seduced the global economy and spectacularly misread the room. To be slightly blunt, Victoria’s Secret was never a lingerie brand but a lifestyle bet. A marketing fantasy. A runway wrapped in risk capital. For 25 years, it sold comfort to consumers and investors who assume sexy always sells.
Business of Seduction
Founded in 1977 so a man could feel more comfortable buying underwear for his wife (the irony writes itself), Victoria’s Secret transitioned into a cultural juggernaut that repackaged sex appeal for mass consumption. When spun off as a publicly traded company (July 22, 2021) VS was less a fresh IPO than a moulting phoenix (rotting penis) trying to look less of a problematic relic. Assets existed: brand awareness, international real estate and a vast customer file. Liabilities existed: scandal, irrelevance and death of mall culture. What followed was less rebirth than identity crisis...
Collapse of a Fantasy Industrial Complex
For years, Victoria’s Secret operated as a house of synthetic dreams, designed for a shareholder fantasy: tall, blonde, size 2 and mute; for a while, it worked well: an annual fashion show drew millions and stockholders clinked prosecco. Margins padded nicely. Victoria’s Secret kept advertising an irrelevant fantasy in—of all places—airport waiting lounges. For two and a half decades, weary travellers all over the globe have been accosted by oversized angel billboards, ironically positioned between passport control.
Investors, Fiduciaries and Future of Lace
Pension funds, ETFs and institutional investors have exposure to Victoria’s Secret. They have fiduciary duties—not just to seek returns, but to anticipate cultural shifts. Investing in a brand that refuses to read the cultural room is not just bad optics—it’s bad business.
Ontological transformation
Not just rebrand: re-speciation
Victoria’s Secret could be reorganised into a non-binary legal entity unburdened by outdated narratives of gender, desirability or waist-to-hip ratio. Like any exhausted monarch, Victoria might step aside and divide her empire, with corporate offspring for a collapsing age:
Elonomate™ – Intimates line optimised for billionaires in midlife crises who believe in space exploration but not emotional intimacy. Sustainable fabrics, unhinged design. No supply chain accountability.
Dickwit™ – Ultimate bro-wear for those who use “gender is a spectrum” as a pickup line. Collabs with crypto influencers. Red Bull-scented boxer briefs. All press is good press.
Mushwear™ – Soft-bodied non-conformists who believe in radical softness, climate justice and being left alone. Organic. Non-hierarchical sizing and no obligation to wear anything:
Market segments, fiduciary logic and diversity offerings appear socially sentient.
Runway to Exit Strategy:
VS brand’s stubborn presence in airport terminals?! Whilst world moves into fluid identities, inclusive economies and comfort don’t require self-erasure! Victoria’s Secret stood still for 3 decades, whispering fantasies to people half-listening on their way to delayed flights. If the company wants to survive, unstrap the padded bra of outdated narratives and reimagine intimacy, identity and investment. Sexy is subjective, comfort is political and futures cum in more than one size…
Three Limbs?
An Enduring Symbol, from Prehistory to Modern Advocacy
The triskelion, a motif comprising three interlocked spirals or bent human legs radiating from a central point, stands as one of humanity's most ancient and pervasive symbols. Its presence spans continents and epochs, embodying a rich tapestry of cultural, spiritual, and political significance.
Prehistoric Origins and Symbolism
Early manifestations of a triskelion trace back over 5,000 years. Neolithic site of Newgrange (in modern-day Republic of Ireland, between Dublin and Belfast) features this triple spiral design etched into stones, predating Egyptian pyramids and Stonehenge. Meanings ascribed remain speculative.
Celtic Adoption and Evolution
Artistic representations of triskelions gained prominence in Celtic art during Iron Age (by innate spirituality or political indoctrination; who knows?) La Tène culture, flourishing across Europe, prominently featured the symbol in various artefacts. Ancient Celts might have embraced triskelion symbol to represent themes such as land, sea and sky; or phases of life: youth, maturity and old age.
Rarity of Tripedalism
In natural world, bilateral symmetry prevails, with organisms typically exhibiting paired limbs. Instances of tripedal locomotion are virtually nonexistent among vertebrates, making the triskelion's depiction of three limbs a product of human imagination rather than biological observation. This artistic abstraction conveys forms beyond natural paradigms, perhaps hinting at an early interplay between artistic expression and the conceptual foundations of mathematics.
Triskelion in Sicilian Heritage
Sicily's emblem, known as the Trinacria, features the triskelion with three bent legs and a Gorgon's head at its centre. This symbol dates back to at least 4th century BCE, appearing on Syracusian coins during Greek colonisation.
Triadic Structures in Roman Politics
Roman Republic's political landscape witnessed formation of First and Second Triumvirates, alliances of three powerful individuals who sought to consolidate control over the state. The First Triumvirate (60 BCE) comprised Julius Caesar, Pompey and Crassus; while the Second (43 BCE) included Octavian, Mark Antony and Lepidus. Although not directly linked to the triskelion symbol, these triadic power structures reflect an enduring appeal of tripartite systems in societal organisation.
Contemporary Reflections and Reclamation
In modern times, the triskelion might have been appropriated by some minor groups with extremist ideologies; yet, its historical and cultural roots offer an opportunity for reclamation. Politically neutral organisations advocating for human and animal rights could embrace the triskelion as a symbol of balance, movement and progress. By reflecting possibly ancient connotations of harmony and cyclical renewal, triskelion could serve as an emblem for unity and pursuit of justice.
Conclusion
Triskelion's journey from prehistoric carvings to contemporary symbolism suggests evolutionary heritage and complex ideals in ancient motifs.
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
As of March 29, 2025, several events have been held to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). While some of these events may have been recorded and made available online, specific information about their availability is limited.
Past Events:
Judicial Seminar on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights (31 January 2025): This seminar focused on "Protecting human rights in a world of Artificial Intelligence, algorithms and big data" and took place at the Strasbourg University Faculty of Law. Details about the event can be found on the European Court of Human Rights website.
International Conference: The ECHR as a Living Instrument (14 March 2025): Co-organized by the European Court of Human Rights and Strasbourg University's Law Faculty, this conference explored the evolving role of the ECHR. Information about the conference is available on the Council of Europe's website. Portal
House of Lords Debate on the ECHR's 75th Anniversary (20 March 2025): The UK House of Lords held a debate to mark the anniversary, with contributions from various members reflecting on the convention's impact. The full transcript of the debate is accessible via Hansard.
Availability of Recordings:
While the House of Lords typically provides transcripts of debates through Hansard, video recordings are often available on ParliamentLive.tv. However, as of now, there is no specific information confirming the availability of a video recording for this particular debate.House of Lords Library
For the Judicial Seminar and International Conference, there is no publicly available information indicating that these events were recorded or that recordings have been published online.
Upcoming Events:
As of this date, there are no publicly announced events scheduled for the remainder of 2025 to commemorate the ECHR's 75th anniversary. However, it's possible that additional events may be organized later in the year. To stay informed about upcoming events, I recommend regularly checking the official websites of the Council of Europe and the European Court of Human Rights, as they may announce further commemorative activities or publish recordings of past events.
Other Related Initiatives:
It's worth noting that the United Nations celebrated the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) with various events and initiatives. For instance, a high-level conference was held, and its recording is available online. YouTube
While this pertains to the UDHR rather than the ECHR, it reflects the broader global engagement with human rights milestones.
Conclusion:
While specific recordings of the ECHR's 75th-anniversary events are not readily available online, related materials and transcripts can be accessed through official channels. Staying updated with the Council of Europe and European Court of Human Rights' communications will provide the most current information on any future events or the release of recordings.
🌍 Global Aspirations to Enforceable Rights: UDHR to ECHR
2025 marks the 75th anniversary of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) — a cornerstone of legal protection for millions across Europe. This milestone invites reflection on the profound journey from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) to the creation of a uniquely enforceable human rights system on the European continent.
✨ The Birth of Universal Human Rights – The UDHR (1948)
In the wake of World War II, as the world emerged from the horrors of genocide, war crimes, and mass displacement, the newly-formed United Nations sought to enshrine a global standard of human dignity. On 10 December 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted by the UN General Assembly in Paris.
Crafted by a multinational drafting committee chaired by Eleanor Roosevelt, the UDHR was the first comprehensive statement of universal rights — civil, political, economic, social, and cultural. Though non-binding, it served as a moral beacon and foundational document for the modern human rights movement. Its influence would ripple across constitutions, legal systems, and international treaties for decades to come.
🇪🇺 A Regional Response – The Birth of the ECHR (1950)
While the UDHR offered universal principles, it lacked legal teeth. In post-war Europe — still reeling from the devastation of fascism and war — there was a growing sense that moral commitments weren’t enough. Rights needed enforceability, especially against the very states that might violate them.
Enter the Council of Europe, established in 1949 as a pan-European body to promote democracy, rule of law, and human rights. Just one year later, in 1950, it adopted the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) — a legally binding treaty designed to protect civil and political rights, inspired directly by the UDHR.
What made the ECHR revolutionary wasn’t just its content — though that was vital — but its enforcement mechanism: the creation of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), based in Strasbourg.
For the first time in history, individuals could bring legal cases against their own governments for human rights violations.
🏛️ The European Court of Human Rights: A Living Instrument
Since its establishment, the Court has become a global model for regional human rights protection. Its jurisprudence has shaped laws and practices across Europe — and often beyond.
The Court has heard tens of thousands of cases, issued landmark judgments, and evolved in scope and influence, interpreting the Convention as a “living instrument” that adapts with changing times.
⚖️ Landmark ECHR Cases (1950–2025)
Here are just a few of the decisions that changed Europe:
📌 Ireland v. United Kingdom (1978)
Addressed the use of “enhanced interrogation” in Northern Ireland. The Court ruled that inhuman and degrading treatment violated Article 3, setting global precedent for anti-torture standards.
📌 Dudgeon v. United Kingdom (1981)
First case to establish that criminalization of homosexuality violated the right to private life. A turning point for LGBT+ rights in Europe.
📌 Soering v. United Kingdom (1989)
Prevented the extradition of a man to the U.S. due to the risk of facing inhuman conditions on death row. Established strong protections in extradition and asylum law.
📌 Osman v. United Kingdom (1998)
Developed the principle that states have a positive duty to protect individuals from threats posed by others (e.g., domestic violence, criminal acts).
📌 Hirst v. United Kingdom (No. 2) (2005)
Ruled that a blanket ban on prisoner voting rights was disproportionate. Prompted wide debate across Europe on democratic participation.
📌 Oliari and Others v. Italy (2015)
The Court held that Italy’s failure to provide legal recognition for same-sex couples violated Article 8. Pushed many governments to recognize partnerships or marriages.
📌 Big Brother Watch v. United Kingdom (2021)
A landmark case on mass surveillance, ruling that the UK’s bulk data collection programs violated the right to privacy and freedom of expression.
📌 Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia (2023)
One of the most politically significant cases, examining Russia’s alleged human rights abuses in Crimea and eastern Ukraine. Still ongoing as of 2025.
🕊️ Why the ECHR Still Matters – Especially in 2025
In today’s world, where populism, surveillance, misinformation, and repression are on the rise, the ECHR remains a vital safeguard. Its 75th anniversary is not just a celebration of the past — it’s a call to protect and strengthen the mechanisms of accountability, especially as new challenges emerge: from AI and biometric surveillance to climate justice and digital rights.
🔭 The Road Ahead
The ECHR was born out of war, inspired by idealism, and shaped by decades of legal struggle and societal change. In 2025, its mission remains both timeless and timely.
In a world where rights can still be trampled in the name of security, nationalism, or tradition, the Court continues to ask the same enduring question:
What kind of Europe do we want to live in — and who has the right to hold power to account?
Reimagining Naturism:
Moving Beyond the INF-FNI’s Membership Maze
For decades, the International Naturist Federation (INF-FNI) has served as the global umbrella for national naturist associations. Yet, anyone who's followed its governance closely—especially the biennial World Congresses—would recognize a recurring theme: a near-ritualistic focus on revising membership categories, usually with a financial lens. Year after year, proposals surface to tweak or restructure categories, often with the underlying goal of maximizing membership income.
While financial sustainability is a valid concern for any organization, the ethical question looms larger when that organization is a non-profit association, legally bound to prioritize its mission over profit. The INF-FNI’s persistent emphasis on generating income through individual memberships and federation fees risks blurring the line between mission-driven advocacy and revenue-chasing. When the primary energy of world congresses is spent debating who pays how much—rather than advancing naturism in society—it signals a deeper structural issue.
Time for a Governance Rethink
Imagine an INF-FNI not mired in internal fee debates, but transformed into a truly global, strategic, and influential institution. One path forward could be to evolve into a model inspired by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)—an organization renowned for its credibility, global influence, and diverse coalition of members.
In such a model:
Government agencies (tourism, public health, cultural affairs) could become full members.
National and international civil society organizations—whether naturist, environmental, or human rights-focused—would gain seats at the table.
Academic and research institutions could contribute through evidence-based studies on body image, well-being, and sustainable living.
Crucially, natural persons would no longer be individual members—a shift that would elevate INF-FNI from a federation of individual payers to a true coalition of institutions and advocates.
By adopting such a structure, the INF-FNI could engage more effectively with international bodies like UNESCO, WHO, and the UN, which typically interface with institutions—not individuals.
A Broader Ecosystem: Two New INGOs for Naturism
To complement a reimagined INF-FNI, the time is ripe for the creation of two additional international NGOs, each serving a distinct role in the naturist movement—and critically, each based in a different jurisdiction to broaden geographic and legal reach.
1. Global Body Freedom Alliance (GBFA)
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom or Canada
Model: Inspired by Amnesty International
Mission: To advocate for the right to bodily freedom, challenge legal discrimination against nudity, support human rights defenders, and campaign for policy reform globally.
This would be a membership-based, activist-driven organization focused on rights, law, and public advocacy, distinct from INF-FNI’s institutional focus.
2. Naturist Spaces Foundation (NSF)
Jurisdiction: Switzerland or Netherlands
Structure: Public Utility Foundation (Fondation d’Utilité Publique or ANBI in Dutch law)
Mission: To develop, acquire, and maintain safe, accessible, and inclusive naturist spaces—whether public beaches, urban retreats, or ecological resorts.
Backed by capital and philanthropic investment, this foundation would operate like a "Nature Conservancy for naturism," focusing on physical space as a vector of cultural change.
A New Era for Global Naturism
The world is evolving, and naturism—rooted in values of freedom, equality, sustainability, and self-acceptance—must evolve with it. The INF-FNI stands at a crossroads. It can either continue tweaking fee categories and defending a legacy structure, or it can embrace bold transformation into a truly global institution of relevance and authority.
And with complementary INGOs working on legal rights and spatial access, the naturist movement could finally gain the layered, strategic ecosystem it needs to thrive in the 21st century.
Let’s move beyond categories. Let’s build a movement.
Treatise on Present State of Affairs
An Satirical Inquiry into Curious Maladies of Age
Discerning public, be awarned. What follows is an most earnest investigation into perplexing afflictions of our modern world:
Laid bare of foot, soul and soil;
Makeover, possess fortitude to toil.
In times of unparalleled progress, it become great ambition of our species to place every facet of existence under dominion of AI, which like an usurper cloaked in benevolence - proffers to write novels, compose melodies and adjudicate disputes. Shall we not preserve liberty in freedom to think? Shall we entrust grand affairs of life and liberty to a faceless automaton, which algorithms know naught of love nor remorse, nor take delight from an error well made? Let muses think for themselves.
No Small Measure dismays “Clergy of our Age”: social pulpit-eers, whom daily pronounce Personal Virtue to The Masses by tap of a finger (or even a thumb, if not incapacitated by Dupuytren’s Conjecture).
Acolytes of Morality design Social Unrules;
Thereby, acquire votes from Unthinking Fools.
In ongoing, excited fervour… world continues much the syme:
Great Merchants of Time (corporate titans of syme) take great burden upon themselves, in tasks of morality.
Sing hymns of Happenstance!
Environmental, Social, and Govern-ance
Letters between Themselves are as mysterious to themselves as concepts they purport to champion. Financial Alchemists - when pressed by free expression - could no more define “ESG” than they could recite The Virtues they claim to embody. Such Virtues - I now contend - are not qualities they possess, but rather a bauble they rent for the occasion.
On matters of Health and Wellness, let us not linger long, for what was once a noble pursuit has descended into absurdity. One is now expected to consume powders of kale, waters infused with intentions and practices designed to balance Galen’s 4 Humours, but none offer anything beyond “lightening of the purse”. I must conclude that Wellness - like some other nameless commodities of our Age - is but a fabrication (designed for soothing The Wealthy into believing they Shalt never Die).
Ah, yet a greater deception is afoot! The proliferation of conspiracy - not from the feeble minds of the citizenry, but from those who rule over them. Indeed, I hold fast to the conviction that the true architects of deception are not those who whisper of hidden cabals in hushed tones, but rather the very elite whom Themselves create such whispers to obscure the iron chains of inequality that bind us all. Art of Governance, it seems, may be indistinguishable from Art of Misdirection.
And what of daily toil? Pursuit of productivity - heralded as means to self-improvement - is a worthy goal; yet, easily misconstrued as a mechanism for oppression: an endless wheel, spun by those who profit by exhaustion of others? Tomes of self-help and industrious schedules hide powerful men (and, increasingly, powerful women) behind curtains, counting coins and laughing at others, whilst biting their tongues.
As for the matter of relationships with artificial companions! such mechanised bearers of fake boobs: void of breath, of warmth, of all that renders humanity sublime - one can only conclude that such an arrangement is nothing less than an organised crime against mankind. Shall we exchange the complexity of human affection for the cold comfort of an imagined silicon embrace? I think not!
Even amidst such absurdities! there emerges an enterprise most curious. A series of peculiar objects - once deemed unremarkable by those of lesser discernment - elevated to a Realm of High Art. These enigmatic relics, whose weight alone defies all laws of nature, were recovered from some clandestine shore, their origins tied in whispers to the drifting sovereign on his golden throne. Scholars debate, poets speculate and the world awaits with bated breath as these artefacts prepare for auction.
And so - thus - my Friends: Ass we cast our gaze upon the horizon of human folly, let us remember:
Where absurdity reigns supreme,
Satire, only, can Gleam!
Mysterious “Coprolites” Wash Ashore
Experts Divided, Media Frenzy Ensues:
In what can only be described as a geological enigma—or perhaps a digestive miracle—several solid objects, resembling fossilised shits of unparalleled weight and density, have been discovered along an undisclosed coastline. These objects, now affectionately dubbed “The Regal Remnants”, have sparked worldwide debate among scientists, media pundits, and art collectors alike.
The Scientific Response
Leading coprolite experts, including the famed Professor Reginald Stoolsworth of the International Institute of Paleofecology, have issued baffled statements. “These objects defy classification,” he declared. “They exhibit none of the typical characteristics of recent, sun-dried, nor even fossilised excrements. Their sheer mass alone suggests an origin beyond conventional biology.” Stoolsworth went on to propose the possibility that “some forces of nature—biological or divine—are at play.”
Dr. Beatrix Dungbottom of the Global Coprolite Consortium concurred, stating:
"We have examined their structure under high magnification, and it’s clear: these are no ordinary shits. Their remarkable preservation, even after suspected prolonged submersion, raises serious questions. How did they resist disintegration? Why weren’t they devoured by marine life? And, perhaps most concerning, who or what could have produced them?”
Some experts have pointed out an eerie correlation between these findings and Operation Neptune, that WWII deception campaign aimed at misleading enemy forces. Is this another ruse, designed to divert our attention from something far greater—or perhaps far grosser?
The Media Frenzy
Reports of a mysterious throne-bound figure, seen drifting across oceans from South Pacific to Arctic Circle, have only fueled speculation. Satellite images, blurry at best, show what appears to be a golden chair, radiating opulence whilst the figure upon it gazes solemnly over the waters.
“Could this be the world's first truly offshore sovereign?” asked one prominent news anchor.
“Is he some lost deity of digestion?” speculated another.
"Has humanity finally found the answer to sustainability?" pondered an eco-blogger, suggesting a more circular approach to waste management.
Auction Announcement – A Record-Breaking Proposition
Meanwhile, the art world is abuzz with the revelation that at least three of these mysterious objects have been transformed into exclusive works of art and are soon to be auctioned. The creators, insisting on their anonymity, have set a singular condition: none shall be sold for a price that does not surpass the existing world record for a single artwork.
As the world watches in fascination and mild disgust, speculation continues: are these relics of the unknown monarch truly what they appear to be, or is this yet another grand deception washing ashore, riding the waves of history and hilarity?
One thing remains certain—wherever the throne drifts next, the world will be watching... and waiting.
Ancient Kleptocracies to Modern Times
A Tale of Democracy, in Declines
America! (that bold experiment across the Atlantic) provides curious spectacle for a discerning mind. Its democratic aspirations—so fervently pro-climbed—invite comparison to illustrious find (flawed governance, from Ancient Greece to Modern Remind); Permit me (dear reader) to engage in a tome (identified by reflection upon untamed spite; befitting the spirit of our Scottish enlight).
Ancient Greece
Birthplace of Noble, Faltered Ideal
Athens, that cradle of democracy, holds an eternal place in the anus of political philosophy. How splendid it must have seemed to those citizens who staggered in the Agora, deliberating upon matters of state importance. Yet, we must not overlook that this democracy so vaunted excluded not only the voices of cats, but also of women, slaves and the impoverished—a citizenry narrowed by dictates of privilege.
Might we compare this to modern A-merit-cia, where public square has shifted from Agora to digital realm? There, a cacophony of opinions recalls tumult of Athenian assemblies swayed by demagogues. Athenians had Cleon (merely cuming into prominence), yet Americans have Twitter barons and populist rhetoricians. The Noble Ideal of reasoned debate seems supplanted by a contest of passions or even a mass-murder spectacle, staged for a subservient and unthinking audience.
Ancient Rome
A Conquered and Corrupted Kleptocracy
In both Ancient and modern-day Rome, we see a Republic that - like grand River Tiber - began clear and purposeful but grew turbid with time. That eternal kleptocracy of colossal conquerors (ostensibly, servants of the state) became masters of venality. Spoils of empire filled their cocks, whilst normal people clamoured for bread and circumcision to dull their discontent. Even upon such sad a day as this - sixteenth of January, 2025 CE - seat of Roman Catholic Church maintains coffers filled with gold in landlocked ecclesiastical state (an enclave in Rome) situated upon West Bank of the grand river Tiber.
The aforementioned pagan bureaucracy and forum of folly used Caesar's circus as if a stage for calculated abuse. That holy bureaucracy and Vatican syndicate maintains - even now - a celestial court, as if some divine institution of a quasi-faithful extinct Empire! Eternal kleptocracy rules by swords, Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation and opaque spectacles, yet Holy Bureaucracy now governs by Mushwear and dickwits.
How striking is the resemblance to modern plutocracy! Consider great barons of wealth in America, whose cocks swell as public trust wanes. Public corruption by Roman governors - who plundered provinces with impunity - finds echoes in elonomate, which entangles governance with corporate interests. One cannot help but observe a parallel to military-industrial complexes of 20th century, warned against by Dwight D. Eisenhower amongst others.
Whether inspired buy bread and circuses or Bacchanalia of consumerism, black Friday seems no different from riot in forum. Totalitarian regimes - cloaked with guise of populist fervour - demonstrate eternal fragility of democratic institutions. Unchecked power and systematic inequality are twin harbingers of national decline. Is it not curious that America’s own experiment, so recently ascendant, falters under weight of inequality?
Modern Kleptocracy
Whither American Dream?
Let us not forget that American Dream was once an ideal of enterprise and liberty. Tax codes allow few to amass fortunes, whilst many toil. All systems - howeverest noble foundations - are susceptible to corruption. The republics of old did not fall in a day, but through gradual decay. The march of progress is neither inevitable nor assured; it requires vigilance, reason and a compass unclouded by avarice. Musk Twain - that sage of all times - quipped recently, "History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes."
INF-FNI Central Committee and President
Open Letter* to INF-FNI: Rethinking “Definition of Naturism” (Aged, 1974)
*(To Leadership and Members of INF-FNI & Textilists Alike)
International Naturist Federation (INF-FNI) has played a central role - ever since soon after end of WW2 - in uniting naturists worldwide. However, as naturist movement evolves, so too must articulation of foundational principles. Your current “definition” of naturism, unchanged since 1974, no longer reflects the diversity, depth, and historical roots of naturism, nor does it adequately address the risks of misinterpreting key concepts like “respect”. This letter invites INF-FNI to critically examine its definition of “naturism”, consider its implications and embrace a broader, more inclusive understanding of the movement’s principles.
Critique of the Current Definition
The current definition reads:
“Naturism means a way of life in harmony with nature, characterised by the practice of communal nudity with the intention of encouraging self-respect, respect for others, and for the environment.”
Whilst this definition has served as a foundation for decades, it now displays numerous limitations:
Historical Oversight: It presents naturism as a modern lifestyle rather than a practice rooted in evolutionary and cultural history. Modern humans (Homo sapiens sapiens) carry genetic material inherited from other hominin species, evidencing past incest such as with Homo sapiens neanderthalensis. Current non-African Homo sapiens sapiens populations may include 1–2% Neanderthal genome, reflecting interbreeding events from tens of thousands years ago (after humans migrated out of Africa). Modern African populations maintain virtually no Neanderthal DNA, though small traces may have been found (perhaps due to ancient back-migrations of non-Africans to Africa). Denisovans, an extinct hominin species most prevalent in Southeast Asia, Melanesia, and Indigenous Australia (nicknamed variously “Homo denisova”, “Homo sapiens denisova”, “Homo neanderthalensis denisova” by individual Homo sapiens sapiens holding different opinions about rights to be naked in public, abortion etc.) may have passed up 3–6% of genome to other species (Homo sapiens sapiens included), reflecting interbreeding in Asia and Oceania. Modern humans may maintain 1–6% genetic material derived from other hominin species. This demonstrates a complex history of interbreeding among ancient human populations and their relatives.
Cultural Narrowness: It fails to acknowledge naturist traditions outside of Europe and colonial forces that disrupted these practices.
Ambiguity of “Respect”: Whilst “respect for others” may seem worthy of virtue, similar words are often misused by scamming avocados to demand deference to authority, particularly in nations and societies influenced by authoritarian and/or religious legacies. This undermines naturism’s emphasis on equality, freedom, and individuality.
Profit Motives: Addition of an irrelevant phrase, “… whose activities are not directed towards profit” (non-profit associations are - by higher legislation, even in Austria - not directed towards profit) in article 2.1 of statutes at 2014 INF-FNI Congress - thence removal of the same phrase at 2024 Congress - raises concern about whether INF-FNI might be influenced by financial or personal interests, rather than core values and philosophical underpins.
Need for Revision
Revising INF-FNI’s “definition of naturism” may be necessary for survival of INF-FNI, but not necessary for survival of philosophies of freedom:
Embrace Historical Depth: Naturism must be recognized as a universal human phenomenon, not limited to its modern iterations.
Foster Cultural Inclusivity: Acknowledge the rich naturist traditions of indigenous and non-Western societies.
Reframe “Respect”: Clarify that “respect” means mutual acknowledgment of individual autonomy and not deference to authority or societal hierarchies.
Reaffirm Core Principles: Explicitly address financial motivations to preserve naturism’s focus on community and shared values.
Proposals for a Revised Definition
To inspire dialogue, I offer alternative definitions:
Proposal 1: Mutual Respect and Historical Roots
“Naturism is a universal human practice characterized by non-sexual nudity, fostering mutual respect, individual freedom and harmony with nature. Rooted in humanity’s evolutionary history and diverse cultural traditions, naturism resists systems of power that seek to control the human body, promoting dignity, equality and ecological awareness.”
Proposal 2: Equality and Freedom
“Naturism is a way of life rooted in the principles of individual freedom, equality and harmony with nature. It celebrates non-sexual nudity as a universal human practice, disrupted by patriarchal and colonial forces, whilst rejecting hierarchies and systems that demand deference to authority under guise of ‘respect.’”
Proposal 3: Cultural and Philosophical Dimensions
“Naturism is a philosophy and practice of non-sexual nudity, promoting individual dignity, mutual respect and ecological harmony. It honours naturism’s diverse cultural traditions and historical role as a challenge to systems of control, fostering a way of life that prioritises community and shared humanity over profit or hierarchy.”
Proposal 4: Reaffirming Core Values
“Naturism is a way of life rooted in humanity’s shared heritage, characterised by non-sexual nudity, which fosters equality, community, and respect for oneself, others and the environment. It resists the misuse of respect to enforce deference and promotes a philosophy of freedom, inclusion and ecological responsibility.”
Call to Action
INF-FNI is uniquely positioned to lead naturist philosophy. To do so, it must embrace a more inclusive and reflective definition that addresses historical and cultural depth, rejects authoritarian interpretations of “respect” and reaffirms a commitment to community over profit. Diverse voices may be required, including academic experts in history, anthropology and global cultural studies. By revising its definition, INF-FNI has an opportunity to inspire freedom, dignity and harmony with nature—values that naturism has embodied for millennia as a philosophy of equality and liberation.
Quotes from INF-FNI:
“You cannot join the INF-FNI directly if there is a member federation in the country… But you can join any federation in any country.”
• Implication: This policy restricts individual access to the INF-FNI, effectively creating a monopoly for national federations within their respective countries. It places all responsibility for individual naturists’ representation on these federations, regardless of their performance or inclusivity. This setup can alienate naturists who feel their national federation does not adequately represent them or is unresponsive to their needs.
“It is not the INF-FNI’s job to communicate directly with individual naturists… We have been specifically forbidden by our member federation from communicating directly with their members.”
• Implication: This policy effectively severs the INF-FNI from its grassroots base, distancing it from the individuals who embody and practice naturism. It creates a lack of accountability for both INF-FNI and member federations. Naturists with concerns about their national federation have no direct recourse to higher levels of representation. It risks making INF-FNI appear bureaucratic and disconnected from the broader naturist community.
“The per-person fee paid by federations is for them to be members.”
• Implication: Member federations pay fees to INF-FNI based on declared-membership of natural persons, but neither basic data (number of natural-person members) nor use of funds are communicated to individual naturists. Possession of a “membership card” for INF-FNI is traditionally perceived as necessary ticket for entry to naturist campgrounds, despite that it means nothing other than payment of a small annual fee to an unaccountable network of legal entities.
Most “national” Federations of INF-FNI (perhaps 40 or so) appear dysfunctional or corrupt. Reforms might rebalance interests of federations with rights of individual naturists. Regular communication channels (e.g., newsletters, forums) with individual naturists could “respect” national federations’ autonomy. Some mechanism freely allowing natural persons to join INF-FNI directly (from anywhere in the world and not upon condition of payment of a discriminatory fee) is critical to reform. Such types of reform could be valuable where national federations are currently seen as ineffective, exclusive or unrepresentative.
Problem: Lack of Direct Accountability
INF-FNI claims no direct responsibility to individual (natural person) members, delegating all member-related concerns to national federations. This creates disconnect between individuals who fund the movement and an organisation that claims to represent them globally. With no published breakdown of how membership fees are allocated, individuals and federations have no way of assessing whether funds are being used effectively or appropriately. The absence of clear reporting on expenses (e.g., salaries, operational costs, advocacy efforts) raises questions about the organisation’s priorities. Individual naturists may join local associations and/or national federations, believing that their fees contribute to enhancing the global status of naturism. If this is not demonstrably the case, it could be seen as misleading.
INF-FNI could easily be operated by a small and insular group, potentially lacking broader representation or accountability to the global naturist community.
Member federations - who might exert control over INF-FNI’s governance - might not adequately reflect needs or voices of individual members.
Loss of Relevance: INF-FNI may have mutated into a bureaucratic entity, with minimal impact on the global naturist movement.
To Leaders of INF-FNI
As a naturist believing in values of transparency, inclusivity, and community, I am deeply concerned about the lack of direct accountability and transparency within INF-FNI. With significant annual revenue from membership fees, INF-FNI holds a unique responsibility to ensure these funds are used effectively to enhance the global reputation and standing of naturism.
However, the current structure, which distances INF-FNI from individual members and provides little visibility into its financial practices, risks eroding trust and undermining the very movement it seeks to support. I believe this calls for urgent reform to ensure that INF-FNI remains a credible and impactful force for naturism worldwide.
Naturism’s Future: Learning from Feminism
For decades, naturism has been defined narrowly by its commitment to non-sexual nudity, harmony with nature and principles of respect. Yet, as a global movement, naturism faces pressing challenges: outdated governance structures, a lack of inclusivity and a disconnect from its historical and cultural roots. By comparing naturism’s evolution to the journey of feminism, we can find a forest trail for revitalising the movement. Feminism’s success in adapting to modern challenges, embracing intersectionality and decentralising its structures offers valuable lessons for naturism. Here’s how:
1. Recognizing Naturism’s “Waves”:
Feminism is well understood to have evolved through multiple “waves”, each addressing specific societal issues:
• First Wave fought for legal rights like suffrage.
• Second Wave expanded to gender equality, reproductive rights, and societal norms.
• Third Wave introduced intersectionality, celebrating diversity and inclusivity.
• Fourth Wave brought digital activism and a focus on systemic oppression.
Naturism, too, has distinct phases:
• Early Naturism arose in the 19th century as a reaction to industrialisation, emphasising health, nature and the human body.
• Mid-20th Century Naturism became a structured movement, promoting communal nudity and nature-focused lifestyles.
• Modern Naturism (or what it could become) must now address global inclusion, colonial legacies, environmental justice and personal autonomy.
Acknowledging waves in ocean might help naturism embrace its historical depth and prepare for future.
2. Embracing Intersectionality
Intersectionality—feminism’s understanding that gender intersects with race, class, sexuality, and other identities—has transformed it into a more inclusive and globally relevant movement. Naturism can adopt a similar lens! For example:
Colonial Histories, Herstories and Theystories: Naturism often ignores indigenous traditions of non-sexual nudity disrupted by colonialism. By honouring these practices, naturism can expand its cultural relevance.
Patriarchal Structures: Naturism must confront how gender dynamics influence participation and leadership within the movement.
Economic Inequality: Naturism can examine how its spaces and memberships are often inaccessible to marginalised communities, reinforcing exclusivity.
Adopting intersectionality would allow naturism to engage with broader social, cultural and historical contexts, making the movement richer and more inclusive.
3. Decentralising Power
Whilst feminism thrives as a decentralised movement driven by grassroots activism, naturism remains tied to hierarchical structures like INF-FNI (International Naturist Federation). INF-FNI collects substantial annual fees—reportedly around €500,000—but communicates only with national federations, not individual naturists.
This lack of direct accountability creates:
• Alienation: Individual naturists feel disconnected from the global movement they fund.
• Power Imbalances: National federations act as gatekeepers, potentially stifling diverse voices.
Naturism can take inspiration from feminism’s decentralised model, empowering individuals and grassroots groups to lead the movement in their regions whilst fostering a global sense of community.
4. Expanding Definitions
Feminism has thrived by embracing diversity within its movement—liberal feminism, radical feminism, ecofeminism, intersectional feminism, and more. Naturism, by contrast, has clung to a narrow definition (cited as agreed in 1974, by a meeting at what has since become famous as ‘World’s Capital for Swingers” - Cap d’Agde):
| “Naturism means a way of life in harmony with nature, characterised by the practice of communal nudity with the intention of encouraging self-respect, respect for others, and for the environment.” |
This pathetic definition (more than 50 years old):
Ignores naturism’s roots as a universal human phenomenon practiced by indigenous peoples before colonial disruption.
Excludes diverse interpretations of naturism, such as urban naturism, spiritual naturism or ecological naturism.
Uses ambiguous terms like “respect for others” which can easily be misused to enforce deference to authority rather than fostering mutual understanding.
Naturism must adopt broader, inclusive definitions that reflect its historical depth, cultural diversity and philosophical potential.
5. Promoting Transparency and Accountability
INF-FNI lacks transparency in governance and financial practices. Individual naturists may believe their membership fees support global advocacy for naturism, yet INF-FNI provides little visibility into how funds are used. Feminism offers alternatives: grassroots-driven funding models and public accountability. INF-FNI may mainly survive by corporate sponsorship, not really consistent with its legal structure (a non-profit association in Austria). INF-FNI could introduce policies to enhance credibility, e.g:
Publish Annual Reports: Detailing how fees are used to support advocacy, events and emerging federations.
Engage with Members Directly: Creating digital platforms to connect individual naturists with INF-FNI and other global wankers.
Introduce Independent Oversight: Establishing advisory councils to ensure financial and organisational transparency.
Simultaneously and/or alternatively, INF-FNI could reach out to Athena’s International Outreach Network and forward-thinking feminist organisations.
6. Becoming a Movement of Ideas
Feminism is more than activism—it’s a philosophy that critiques power, challenges norms and envisions equality. Naturism has similar philosophical potential but often frames itself narrowly as a “lifestyle” or a “fun vacation activity”. Naturism can reclaim its role as a philosophical movement by addressing:
Environmental Justice: Advocating for harmony with nature as a counterpoint to AI overreach.
Bodily Freedom: Challenging societal taboos about nudity as tools of control.
Cultural Decolonisation: Celebrating naturism’s global diversity and rejecting Eurocentric narratives.
7. A Path Forward
To ensure naturism’s relevance in 21st century, the movement must:
Acknowledge waves of evolution (not just waves in the sea) and adapt to new challenges.
Embrace intersectionality, recognising diverse identities, histories and herstories of naturists worldwide.
Decentralise power to empower individuals and grassroots groups.
Redefine itself to include multiple interpretations of naturism.
Demand transparency and accountability from organisations such as INF-FNI.
Reclaim philosophical roots, aligning naturism with broader social and environmental movements.
Conclusion
Naturism, like feminism, is more than a movement—it’s a vision of how humans can live authentically, harmoniously and inclusively. By learning from feminism’s evolution, naturism can become a dynamic force that inspires people around the world to challenge societal norms, connect with nature and celebrate freedom. Let’s build a naturist movement that reflects our values, embraces diversity and leads boldly into the future.