Possible Jurisdictions for 3 INGOs

1. Body Freedom

Mission: A globally dispersed human rights advocacy movement focusing on bodily autonomy and self-expression, encouraging local in-person gatherings for community-building, artistic, and sporting activities without necessitating large international conferences.​

Proposed Jurisdictions:

1. New Zealand

   • Rationale: New Zealand's progressive stance on human rights and personal freedoms complements the organization's mission. Its geographic location in the Asia-Pacific region facilitates outreach in underrepresented areas.​

   • Legal Form: Incorporated Society or Charitable Trust, both offering limited liability and suitable for non-profit activities.​

   • Workers' Rights: New Zealand enforces strong labor laws, including protections for lone workers and mandates for regular contact and emergency protocols.

2. Canada

   • Rationale: Canada's multicultural society and legal protections for individual rights provide a supportive environment. Its bilingual nature (English and French) aids in broader communication.​

   • Legal Form: Non-Profit Corporation or Registered Charity, offering limited liability and eligibility for tax-exempt status.​

   • Workers' Rights: Canadian labor laws vary by province but generally include strong protections, with specific regulations for lone workers in provinces like Alberta and British Columbia.

3. Australia

   • Rationale: Australia's commitment to civil liberties and its strategic location in the Southern Hemisphere support global outreach efforts.​

   • Legal Form: Incorporated Association (state-level) or Company Limited by Guarantee (federal), both suitable for non-profit organizations.​

   • Workers' Rights: Australia has comprehensive labor laws, including specific provisions for lone workers, ensuring their health and safety.

2. Naturist Federation

Mission: To unite naturist communities worldwide under a democratic, inclusive framework that advocates for naturist rights and standards, necessitating in-person meetings and conferences with a focus on reducing carbon footprints.​

Proposed Jurisdictions:

1. Belgium

   • Rationale: As the de facto capital of the EU, Belgium offers proximity to European institutions, facilitating advocacy and collaboration.​

   • Legal Form: Association Internationale Sans But Lucratif (AISBL), designed for international non-profit associations.​

   • Workers' Rights: Belgium has robust labor laws, including recent legislation granting comprehensive rights to workers in various sectors. ​

2. Netherlands

   • Rationale: The Netherlands' central location in Europe and progressive legal environment make it suitable for international federations.​

   • Legal Form: Stichting (Foundation) or Vereniging (Association), both offering limited liability and flexibility.​

   • Workers' Rights: Dutch labor laws provide strong protections, and the country is known for its favorable work-life balance.​

3. Denmark

   • Rationale: Denmark's high levels of transparency and support for civil society initiatives align with the federation's goals.​

   • Legal Form: Forening (Association), characterized by its democratic structure.​

   • Workers' Rights: Denmark is recognized for its strong labor protections and flexible working conditions.​

3. Naturist Spaces

Mission: To function as a financial powerhouse for environmental conservation, acquiring and stewarding land globally for re-wilding and naturist activities, requiring favorable tax exemptions for donations and bequests.​

Proposed Jurisdictions:

1. France

   • Rationale: France's rich history of naturism and vast rural areas make it ideal for land conservation initiatives.​

   • Legal Form: Fondation Reconnue d'Utilité Publique (Public Utility Foundation), eligible for tax-exempt status.​

   • Tax Considerations: Donations to public utility organizations are tax-exempt, and donors may receive tax credits, enhancing fundraising capabilities.

   • Workers' Rights: France has comprehensive labor laws, including provisions for annual leave and worker protections.​

2. Finland

   • Rationale: Finland's strong environmental policies and cultural respect for nature support the organization's mission.​

   • Legal Form: Rekisteröity yhdistys (Registered Association) or Säätiö (Foundation), both suitable for non-profit activities.​

   • Tax Considerations: Finland offers tax incentives for environmental initiatives, and donations to registered associations may be tax-deductible.​

   • Workers' Rights: Finland ranks highly in labor rights indices, reflecting strong protections for workers.

3. Norway

   • Rationale: Norway's emphasis on environmental conservation and open access to land aligns with the organization's goals.​

   • Legal Form: Forening (Association) or Stiftelse (Foundation), both offering limited liability and suitable for managing land assets.​

   • Tax Considerations: Norway provides tax incentives for environmental conservation efforts, and donations to qualifying organizations can be tax-exempt.​

   • Workers' Rights: Norwegian labor law emphasizes fair wages, strong unions, collective bargaining, and work-life balance.